Unbiased platform advice
Objective guidance, grounded in hands-on experience with the leading CLM platforms, to define your requirements, compare options and choose the one that fits how your business contracts.
The challenge
Choosing a CLM tool means wading through a crowded market where every vendor promises everything.
Leading CLM platforms we know hands-on
Phases from discovery to a plan
Requirements you can take to any vendor
Referral fees, so advice follows your needs
Most CLM disappointments begin before the contract with the vendor is signed: requirements written around demos, processes that were never mapped, and selection driven by features rather than fit.
We start with your situation: contracting complexity, the problems you need to solve, priorities, organisation size and budget. Because we have explored and worked with the leading platforms hands-on, we know where each one shines and where it struggles. You get an objective shortlist with clear pros and cons, plus target-state processes and requirements you can take to any vendor.
Contracting complexity, problems to solve, priorities, organisation size and budget.
Clear pros and cons for each option, drawn from real platform experience.
Target-state processes and requirements you can take to any vendor.
We prove the approach on a small sample with you first, then scale. Here is how the work flows, and where AI carries the load versus where our attorneys apply judgement.
Technology where it adds value
An indicative view of how work is shared between AI and our attorneys at each stage. Judgement, protocol and sign-off always stay with people.
Stakeholder interviews, contract volumes, pain points and priorities.
Target-state processes and prioritised, testable requirements.
Structured scoring of shortlisted platforms against your requirements.
A recommendation, business case inputs and an implementation roadmap.
What you receive
A documented recommendation with an unbiased shortlist, target-state process, prioritised requirements and a practical roadmap to implementation.
Where it fits best
Including
The attorney who scopes your work shares pricing up front. These are the models that typically suit clm consultation.
Best for
Defined projects, such as a CLM assessment or a contract clean-up.
How it is billed
One price for an agreed scope and outcome.
Best for
Variable volume, such as document review or abstraction.
How it is billed
Per document or per contract, with a ceiling on total spend.
Best for
Ongoing work, such as platform operations or monitoring.
How it is billed
A monthly fee for a dedicated team, scaled up or down with notice.
Best for
Programmes that mix a project with steady run work.
How it is billed
A fixed fee to build, then a unit rate or team fee to run.
Yes. Our CLM Implementation service picks up directly from the consultation, so requirements carry through without loss.
How a contract review playbook turns every escalation into a decision made once, and why the best programs track how often they have to ask.
A framework for assessing legal technology investments that accounts for integration complexity, change management, and long-term total cost of ownership.
Why contract lifecycle management success depends on operational commitment, not just technology selection. Lessons from organizations that moved beyond the initial deployment.
Configuration, migration and adoption support from attorney-technologists, shaping your CLM around how your attorneys actually contract.
AI-based, human-validated extraction of key terms and clause data from contracts in any language, delivered in your format or loaded into your CLM.
Routine sales and procurement contracts reviewed and negotiated on your behalf, against a playbook we build for you from your own negotiation history.
We map your requirements against the platforms that fit, lay out the trade-offs side by side and help you reach a decision that lasts.
Start a Conversation