Configured by attorney-technologists
Configuration, migration and adoption support from attorney-technologists, shaping your CLM around how your attorneys actually contract.
The challenge
A CLM only pays off when it is configured around how your attorneys actually contract.
Equal depth in contracting and platform configuration
Leading CLM platforms supported
Design, configure, migrate, hand over
Adoption support from go-live
Implementations stall when configuration is left to people who do not draft or negotiate contracts. Templates do not match practice, approval paths frustrate the business, and legacy contracts never make it in.
Our team wears both hats with equal depth: the same people who draft and negotiate contracts also configure the platforms, so nothing is lost in translation. We design and configure templates, workflows, approvals and clause libraries, migrate your legacy contracts, and support adoption so your teams use the platform from day one.
Equally at home drafting a clause and configuring a workflow.
Templates, workflows, approvals, clause libraries and data migration.
Training and hand-over, so teams use the platform from day one.
We prove the approach on a small sample with you first, then scale. Here is how the work flows, and where AI carries the load versus where our attorneys apply judgement.
Technology where it adds value
An indicative view of how work is shared between AI and our attorneys at each stage. Judgement, protocol and sign-off always stay with people.
Contract types, templates, approval matrices and integrations designed with your attorneys.
Workflows, clause libraries and permissions built on the platform.
Legacy contracts abstracted, migrated and tested end to end.
Training, playbooks and hypercare so adoption sticks.
What you receive
A configured, tested CLM with your templates, workflows and legacy contracts in place, and teams trained to use it.
Where it fits best
Including
The attorney who scopes your work shares pricing up front. These are the models that typically suit clm implementation.
Best for
Defined projects, such as a CLM assessment or a contract clean-up.
How it is billed
One price for an agreed scope and outcome.
Best for
Variable volume, such as document review or abstraction.
How it is billed
Per document or per contract, with a ceiling on total spend.
Best for
Ongoing work, such as platform operations or monitoring.
How it is billed
A monthly fee for a dedicated team, scaled up or down with notice.
Best for
Programmes that mix a project with steady run work.
How it is billed
A fixed fee to build, then a unit rate or team fee to run.
Yes. We often act as the legal-side design authority working with the vendor or a systems integrator, or we lead the configuration ourselves.
Objective guidance, grounded in hands-on experience with the leading CLM platforms, to define your requirements, compare options and choose the one that fits how your business contracts.
AI-based, human-validated extraction of key terms and clause data from contracts in any language, delivered in your format or loaded into your CLM.
Routine sales and procurement contracts reviewed and negotiated on your behalf, against a playbook we build for you from your own negotiation history.
From configuration and migration to training and adoption, our attorney-technologists take your platform from signed licence to delivered value.
Start a Conversation
