
Evaluating Legal Technology: Beyond the Feature List
A framework for assessing legal technology investments that accounts for integration complexity, change management, and long-term total cost of ownership.
Monitored, structured, actionable
Regulatory, judicial and government sources monitored, with relevant signals extracted, human-validated and delivered as trackers, alerts and dashboards.

The challenge
Relevant legal developments surface across many websites, and nobody can watch them all.
Regulatory, judicial and government sources
Signals checked by people
Into trackers and dashboards
Alerts for what your team needs
Court hearing dates, new regulations, consultation papers, government website changes and country positions on a legal topic are published across hundreds of sources, in different formats and languages.
We monitor the sources you care about, capture and validate the relevant signals, structure them, and deliver trackers, alerts, dashboards and reports tailored to what your team needs to act on.
Regulatory, judicial, government and other sources, from court hearing dates to website changes.
Relevant signals are captured, checked and structured.
Trackers, alerts, dashboards and reports tailored to what your team needs.
We prove the approach on a small sample with you first, then scale. Here is how the work flows, and where AI carries the load versus where our attorneys apply judgement.
Technology where it adds value
An indicative view of how work is shared between AI and our attorneys at each stage. Judgement, protocol and sign-off always stay with people.
Sources, topics and alert thresholds agreed.
Sources watched and relevant changes captured.
Signals checked, classified and summarised.
Dashboards, trackers and alerts delivered on cadence.
What you receive
Trackers, alerts and dashboards such as country positions on a legal topic, regulatory developments in a jurisdiction, court activity and government website changes.
Where it fits best
Examples
The attorney who scopes your work shares pricing up front. These are the models that typically suit legal signal intelligence.
Best for
Defined projects, such as a CLM assessment or a contract clean-up.
How it is billed
One price for an agreed scope and outcome.
Best for
Variable volume, such as document review or abstraction.
How it is billed
Per document or per contract, with a ceiling on total spend.
Best for
Ongoing work, such as platform operations or monitoring.
How it is billed
A monthly fee for a dedicated team, scaled up or down with notice.
Best for
Programmes that mix a project with steady run work.
How it is billed
A fixed fee to build, then a unit rate or team fee to run.
In the way your team works: email alerts, a shared tracker, a dashboard or periodic reports.

Vendor-neutral assessment of your workflows, a technology roadmap built around them, and hands-on implementation and adoption support.

We assess where GenAI adds real value against its risk, then build it into your existing legal workflows and platforms, connecting siloed tools and data into one automated flow with human checkpoints.

We run your legal platforms and processes day to day, take on one-off projects, and provide skilled people, from one specialist to a full embedded team, whenever you need capacity.
We monitor the regulatory, judicial and government sources that matter to you and turn them into validated trackers, alerts and dashboards.
Start a Conversation